I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD.
-William Lloyd Garrison
First editorial in The Liberator
January 1, 1831

Thursday, December 24, 2020

Bah Humbug!

 Summary:  tomorrow is Christmas day. As I've done for most of the 31 years that I have been admitted to the practice of law, I will spend at least a part of Christmas Day in my office, were at least briefly I can find refuge from the stress and anguish that always seems to happen on Christmas Day. In my office, in the silence of the day, surrounded by books and other tools of the trade of a lawyer, I can find, no matter how briefly, a sense of peace that may enable me to get through the day.

Cathedral City – December 25, 2020. For me, there is no Christmas this year. No Christmas cards, no presents, no family gatherings, no friends. No parents. I knew it was going to be a tough Christmas when my mother passed away in January of this year. I knew that Christmas would be even tougher when I lost my best friend in this desert to what appears to of been a thoracic aneurysm two days before my birthday. Add to that the fact that most of my family seems to have turned its back on me, and it may be understandable that my reaction to Christmas, 2020 is an unfootnoted "bah, humbug."

Today, as at every Christmas for the last 20 years, while I was out and about, I saw one of the Coachella Valley's population of homeless people, this one walking along Highway 111 in front of the shopping center at the corner of Date Palm Drive, pushing a shopping cart with the kind of weary dignity that seems to be the hallmark of every un-housed person one sees at this time of year.

There, but for the grace of God, go I.

And so I say, again, "Bah, humbug."


I cannot know why this year should have been so un-footnotedly awful. All of us have had to live with the unfortunate reality of the worst pandemic in our lifetimes, made even more so by the feckless, incompetent, unhinged, well-nigh-treasonable "leadership" of Donald Trump. Never has a president so merited arrest, trial, conviction, forfeiture, and imprisonment as this one.

We can but hope that the incoming administration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will not be moved by fear of the Trump base, but will be attentive, rather, to the anger of the large majority of Americans and of our allies who are clamoring to see Trump and his enablers held accountable for their manifest crimes and iniquities against the United States and against our allies.

But, more to the point, we, particularly those of us who are Conformist in our Religion, should always remember that ultimately, man proposes and God disposes. The ultimate answer to all our prayers is either "yes," "no," or, "wait." Now it may seem that an acknowledgment that God is in control is nothing more than a copout, an easy, fatalistic, abdication of our personal responsibility.

Yet, as we come into this Incarnation season, when, on the morrow, we commemorate the Incarnation of God Godself in the flesh of Jesus Christ our Savior, we must acknowledge, that, as difficult as it may seem, the Incarnation is the passionate reaching out of God to the People of God. God's passionate love for us is passionately expressed in the Incarnation, Passion, Resurrection, and Ascension of  He Who bears us all in His pierced hands.

 Yet still, faced with all that one has gone through this year, one still may be excused for saying "Bah, humbug," while paradoxically saying, as it is quoted in the Gospel according to St. Matthew, "O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me," if it be God's will. Matt. 26:39.

Merry Christmas to you all.

Saturday, November 7, 2020

MY COUNTRY, A PROMISE OF REDEMPTION

 Summary: Joe Biden became president-elect today. For Joe it has been the crowning achievement of a half-century of public service. For vice president-elect Kamala Harris, it’s something a little bit more.  Kamala, or as some of us refer to her, somewhat avuncularly, particularly after her debate with outgoing vice president Mike Pence, as “Momala,” for the steely expression and reproving tone that accompanied her admonition “I’m speaking,” when he tried to interrupt her during their debate, will be a breaker of glass ceilings in a pronounced way. The first Black woman, the first South Asian, the first woman, to serve as vice president of the United States. All in all, many of us are feeling a kind of relief today after four years of Donald Trump, over a year of a hypertrophied election campaign, nearly a year of the pandemic, and the last week of almost unspeakable election tension.

---------------------------------------

Cathedral City, Saturday, November 7, 2020 –- It’s over. 

After more than a year and a half of pre-election posturing, after nearly a week of almost unspeakable tension and drama in the actual election process, it’s all over, bar the shouting and the results from as yet uncalled battleground states.. 

 Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are the President and Vice President-elect of the United States. 

How pleasant it is to pronounce the words "President Biden" and "Vice-President Harris."

We may perhaps be forgiven a few moments of joy. After four years of the unspeakable, unthinkable, frankly unwatchable, presidency of Donald Trump, American democracy, that hard-pressed, oft maligned, abstraction, has proven more resilient than we had given it credit for being. Thus, before Trump and his revanchistes attempt some dirty tricks this afternoon, this evening, or tomorrow, we may greet with a passing, indulgent smile, the celebrations that have occurred and which are breaking out in cities across the United States and among our allies.

For those of us who have been largely consumers and end-users of politics during these tumultuous times, the coming of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will be greeted with more hope and more anticipation than the coming of any presidency since that of Bill Clinton in 1992. Indeed, we will probably expect more from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris then we expected from Barack Obama and Joe Biden when they took over in January of 2009.

Of course, the expectation game is a common one in American politics. When George Dubya Bush became president in 2000 after a questionable election and questionable intervention by SCOTUS, his partisans rather giddily expected a wholesale repudiation of all of the works of the previous Bill Clinton ministration. ABC anything but Clinton, was their mantra. Similarly, the Trump administration appears to be guided by the mantra of “undo anything of Barack Obama’s.”

For Democrats, the expectation, come 2021, will be that much of the early months of a Biden administration will be involved in restoring those Obama initiatives which Trump and his enablers sought to undo at every turn

Most Democrats will be looking for a Biden administration to rejoin promptly the Paris climate accord.

 Most Democrats will be looking for a Biden administration to reverse Trump’s anti-immigrant initiatives, and to unbuild Trump’s ridiculous border wall that has been demonstrated not to work. 

Most of us probably expect that these iterations or initiatives will be set in train within the first hundred days of a Biden administration.

But, as much as Democrats of all types will have a long list of expectations; they must be prepared to temper those expectations with a sympathetic, pragmatic understanding of reality.
Our Aotsunami (Big Blue Tidal Wave) did not materialize in quite the fashion we had hoped. We will have a Democratic president, we will have a Democratic House, but unless Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff prevail in their runoff elections in Georgia in January, the Senate will remain in Republican hands. That means that, again, unless Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff are successful, Mitch McConnell will still be a one-man barrier to getting things accomplished. Thus, Democrats need to rally to Joe and Kamala rather than falling into the Democratic temptation of wagging fingers and criticizing the president of their own party because he has not brought about utopia in a day.We must not live down to the traditional Democratic stereotype of carping on the limitations our victory and crapping on those at the top of our ticket.

Indeed, utopia may be unattainable until and unless a Biden Justice Department is able to stamp out the wave of Trumpist revanchisme that, as former counterintelligence analyst Malcolm Nance warned us on Real Time with Bill Maher, last Friday night, might well take the form of a low-level paramilitary insurgency. Biden’s Justice Department and law enforcement agencies in the several states will need to pay close attention to any signs of such insurgency, and to any signs of other treasonable Trumpist conspiracies.

Moreover, it is fairly clear that unless there is a successful intervention by Republican allies of Donald Trump who are willing to speak truth to what still imagines itself to be power, Trump himself will try every means available to delegitimize this election. We had hoped for a lot less closer an election then we had. We had hoped that Aotsunami would sweep away not merely Trump but the Republican majority in the Senate and a large part of the Republican minority in the house. Unfortunately, the Big Blue Tsunami proved to be not tsunami, but a Little Blue Sazanami, the pretty, small waves ginned up by a zephyr, as most elections actually tend to be.

Nonetheless, Joe and Kamala should take office and govern as if they had come in riding a landslide. When timorous Democrats are foolish enough to complain to Joe and Kamala about the closeness of their election, Joe and Kamala should respond with the immortal words of California twice-Governor Jerry Brown, “we won, didn’t we?” They should, ironically enough, take a lesson from their immediate predecessor, Donald Trump, who governed as if he had a landslide when in fact the only reason Donald Trump was ever president in the first place was because of that ridiculous relic, the Electoral College, a foolish holdover of the slave power that should have died with the Confederacy at Appomattox in 1865.

At all events, Joe and Kamala need to govern on behalf of the broad majority of Americans who want to return to the civil society and politics of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Busch-Obama years.
While 40% of Americans have sold their souls to Donald Trump, at least 60% of us would like to be able to go about our lives free from the kind of tribalist totalitarianism that Trump and his followers represent. That is the majority to which Joe Biden and Kamala Harris should govern.

Utopia will not be achieved in a single day.
But we may hope that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris may set this country on a necessary path of recovery from the gross aberrations and organized treason that characterized the four years, the four excruciating, the four embarrassing, the four tooth grindingly awful years of Donald Trump. We must so erase the baleful legacy of Donald Trump and of Trumpism that it can never rear is disgusting head in our country again.

So, for a few minutes we can rejoice. But the challenge is still before us. Let us rise to meet it and beat it.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Paul S. Marchand, Esq. is an attorney who lives in Cathedral City and practices law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage. He has been a steady Biden loyalist since the President-elect first announced his campaign. He has little patience for Trumpism, for Republicans, and for traitors. The views contained herein are his own, though he rather expects that they are shared, to a greater or lesser extent, by roughly 60% of the American people. Right now, the other 40% don’t matter.

Monday, October 12, 2020

OCTOBER 12: NEITHER COLUMBUS DAY NOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ DAY; WHY NOT CALL IT ENCOUNTER DAY?

Summary: Every year at Columbus Day, or perhaps, more accurately, Encounter Day, we get our knickers in a knot.  Should we embrace a breast-beating white liberal guilt posture of anguished handwringing and so-called political correctness, or should we fall back on the triumphalist Eurocentric narrative so many of us learned in school?  The day long ago set aside to commemorate the first coming of Columbus to the New World has become an ongoing controversy.  Whose day is it?  Do we celebrate the exploring spirit or do we mourn for our First Peoples?  Does the celebration of the one preclude sober reflection about the fate of the other?  Columbus Day/Encounter Day is, and will always remain, a paradox.  Perhaps we should call the commemoration by the more neutral, more fitting, title of Encounter Day.
--------------------------------


Cathedral City, October 12, 2020- Today was traditional Columbus Day. It is theoretically supposed to commemorate the achievement of Christopher Columbus, a Genoese navigator (and possible Sephardic Jew) who, by sailing across the Atlantic in the late summer and early fall of the Year of Grace 1492, proved what had long been believed and generally accepted in European thought: the sphericity of the earth. Italy and Spain both named warships for the Admiral of the Ocean Sea, and there have been a raft of ocean liners named for him as well.

Commemoratively named warships and ocean liners notwithstanding, the view of many Americans of this day is colored, so to speak, by an ironic New Yorker Columbus Day cartoon of some notoriety depicting two American Indians standing in the underbrush by the shore of a Caribbean island.  From three high-castled ships anchored offshore, boats are rowing toward the beach.  In the lead boat, an explorer (presumably Columbus) stands, holding a flag.  The caption of the cartoon has one Indian saying to the other something like "now might be a good time to review our immigration policies."

Yet, after 500 years, it is too late for the native people in the underbrush to review immigration policies. Now in the last generation, there is been a great deal of white liberal guilt, pearl clutching, handwringing, and revisionist history that has arisen around October 12, the Day of the Race, Columbus Day, or, as politically correct legislative bodies around the country now wish to call it, Indigenous People’s day.

Permit me to suggest that if we must rename the commemoration of the arrival of Columbus’ Flota (or maybe with just three ships, it merits being described as a flotilla) at San Salvador in the Bahamas, we should perhaps try to commemorate the encounter itself, and refer to October 12 not by some Eurocentric, triumphalist description as Columbus Day, or by some politically correct moniker such as Indigenous Peoples’ Day, but by the more neutral and more historically just appellation of “Encounter Day,” even as we remember the New Yorker cartoon with its Indians along the shoreline discussing the importance of reviewing their immigration policies.

The cartoon in question strikes us as funny because we know the history of the 500-plus years since Columbus' arrival in/encounter with the New World triggered the greatest völkerwanderung -a vast migration of peoples- in the recorded history of the world.  Since then, millions of immigrants from all over the world have made their way to the Americas, and the history of their interaction with those who came before has been checkered at best.  Yet, despite all the finger-wagging going on in some quarters, völkerwanderungen themselves are morally neutral phenomena.

For, in the last analysis, we Americans are all descendants of immigrants from elsewhere, even the ethnic group Columbus first identified as “Indians.” If my white ancestors came here as part of the Atlantic migrations, my Indian ancestors arrived here tens, perhaps scores, of thousands of years ago, presumably across the Bering land bridge from Asia, and are still ultimately immigrants.  The term "Native American" is thus something of a misnomer, a fact Canada recognizes by designating her Indians and Inuit as "First Peoples."

Still, by the time the first Europeans reached America -whenever that may have been, but certainly well before Columbus- the Indians of the Americas had established a lengthy tenure of occupation.  Of course, we should remember that the tenure of European occupation in the Western Hemisphere did not begin with the Colombian Encounter on October 12, 1492. In fact, we cannot know when the Europeans first encountered the Western Hemisphere. Some suggest that there may have been Egyptian, Carthaginian, or Roman expeditions to what is now the New World. Irish tradition has it that St. Brendan sailed to the New World with 15 monastic companions in an Irish curragh sometime in the early part of the sixth century.

More reliable, archaeologically-backed research indicates that the first European encounter with the Americas which we have a strong empirical basis to believe actually happened was that of Bjarni Herjólfsson in the year 986. Originally chronicled in the Norse Groenlandinga Saga, Herjólfsson’s voyage has been lent credence by the archaeological evidence of a Norse settlement at L’Anse aux Meadows on the island of Newfoundland. Established around the year 1000, L’Anse aus Meadows, together with the Norse settlements in Greenland, establishes a European tenure of occupation in the Americas stretching back more than a thousand years.

No matter whose tradition one accepts, the history of the European-American encounter is more complex and more nuanced than our politically correct historical revisionists might like to believe.  The Americas were not -as generations of American schoolchildren were once taught- an empty wilderness, but a landmass populated by a mass of humanity more diverse by far than Europe itself.  By 1492, the social development of the Americas ranged from primitive hunter-gathering groups through complex state societies ranging from the mound-builder descendants of North America and the Méxica peoples, to the South American empire whose Inca inhabitants knew it as Tahuantinsuyu, the Four Quarters of the World.

Within two centuries of the Colombian Encounter, all of this had gone. 
The westward migration, the völkerwanderung triggered by Columbus' voyages had grown from trickle to flood.  Wave after wave of migration, particularly to the settlement colonies of British North America, coupled with superior weapons technology (coupled with a disturbing European willingness to use it: Norwegian scholar Helge Ingstad once declared that Columbus had succeeded largely because he and his fellows had firearms.), Superior agricultural and industrial technology, and the spread of European diseases -trivial childhood ailments to whites, fatal to unexposed Indians- together with firearms and edged weapons of Toledo steel, tipped the balance decisively in favor of the pale invaders from across the water.

Thus the history, and thus the deeply conflicted emotions that swirl around any October 12 observance.  Is it Columbus Day?  Is it Dia de La Raza/Day of the Race?  Is it Indigenous Peoples Day?  Whatever one calls it, October 12, or Encounter Day, as I prefer to call it, can be relied upon to pit the Sons of Italy celebrating one of their own against Native American groups calling attention to what has been called "half-a-millennium of resistance."   

Despite the facile characterization of the pale people from Europe as eager perpetrators of “genocide,” we should be chary of attaching such a label to what transpired in the Western Hemisphere. Though the statistics of morbidity among indigenous peoples are certainly the statistics of apparent genocide, we need to be aware that genocide, in international law as defined by Raphael Lemkin, the originator of the concept of genocide, is itself a specific intent crime, i.e., the deliberate, non-negligent, non-accidental, extermination of a particular people, in whole or in part.  Though we may be appalled at the morbidity statistics, the evidence suggests that the butcher’s bill was inflicted as the result of negligence, inattention, and a lack of knowledge rather than as the result of deliberate policy, and thus does not rise to the level of Genocide as that term is understood in international law.

Thus, as always, the truth lies somewhere in the middle, in that no-man's-land to which moderates and truth-seekers -and indeed, most of us- are exiled.  Do we celebrate the human achievement of the explorers and the immigrants, or do we weep for our Indian ancestors?  Do we call attention to the evils the explorers so often brought in their wake, or do we celebrate the achievements of our First Forebears?

The answer is: all of the above.  We cannot reverse the pragmatic sanction of history; the völkerwanderung that brought my European forebears to the Americans is as irreversible as that which brought my Indian ancestors to this place.  The peoples have mixed too much to separate them; the rate of intermarriage among the Cherokee, for example, is close to 100 percent.  Now is no longer an opportune time for the Indians in the underbrush of the New Yorker cartoon to discuss immigration policy.  The invaders cannot be marched back onto their Nãos, caravels and Mayflowers, their Susan Constants, their Godspeeds, and their Discoverys, or even aboard the White Star liner Oceanic, which brought my Limerick-born Irish grandmother across the Atlantic in 1913, and packed back whence they came; their bones and the bones of their children have, as much as the bones of the First Nations, also become part of this land.

Nor can we forget the other ramifications which have preceded from a biological phenomenon which has become known as the Columbian Exchange.
Without the Columbian Exchange, the cuisines of Europe would be innocent of such now-integral foods and stimulants as the potato, the tomato, corn (a word which the British, who cannot seem to handle their own language, use to describe the grain properly known as “wheat.”) chocolate, vanilla, and tobacco. Similarly, without the Columbian Exchange, the tables of the New World would entirely lack such staples as citrus fruits, apples, bananas, mangoes, onions, wheat, rice, and that staple of insomniacs everywhere, coffee. Indeed, until the arrival of Hernán Cortés, the horse, which had originated in what is now North America but had become extinct there, had been unknown to the indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Moreover, while the pale invaders from across the water must take responsibility for such diseases as the measles, the emergence of syphilis, which for almost four centuries cut a horrifying swath across Europe, can be laid at the door of the indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere. In short, the Columbian Exchange, like so many other phenomena throughout history, in the end must be accounted morally neutral. We should be foolish indeed to judge either Christopher Columbus or the Columbian Exchange by the purportedly modern standards of the 21st century. As Winston Churchill observed in 1938, in our own time, “we have seen archbishops pistolled in the nape of the neck in the warm, brilliantly lighted corridors of modern prison.” We have seen women and children machine gunned and hacked to death in their scores, hundreds, and thousands. We possess the capacity to extinguish all life on this planet. We thus have little claim to vaunt some kind of superior civilization to that in which Christopher Columbus, or his contemporaries the Méxica tlatoani Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin, or the Sapa Inca Huayna Capac, lived.

The invasion of the pale people from across the water has been a success.  Generations of interpenetration have produced a people that like mythic Coyote -the culture hero of many tribes- is one of shape-shifters.  Millions of Americans carry the blood of both sides in their veins; millions of us are at once both the invading European and the resistant Indian.  In a time of shape-shifting and mixing, Columbus Day, or Encounter Day, like Coyote, must be a shape-shifter.  It must be an occasion for celebrating the nobility of the exploring spirit, but also for reflection on the duties we all owe to one another as common human inhabitants of the place we all call home.

As Burkean conservatives and Gladstonian liberals, and as Democrats, we must particularly be attuned on Columbus/Encounter Day and every day to what our communities are telling us.  We are a coalition -a movement- composed of communities and tribes and lineages of every sort and condition.  We march with labor, but also support the right of Indians to be accounted as first class citizens of the commonwealth.  We confess many faiths, and none at all.  We acknowledge the right of many Americans of faith to oppose marriage equality within the context of their own churches, but we also insist that America's queerfolk be treated as first class citizens, too.  We embrace inclusiveness, knowing that ours is the harder choice and the nobler path, one from which the fearful of change turn away.

Columbus/Encounter Day has become a paradox, laden with so many layers to deconstruct the debate will continue long after those currently engaged in it have passed out of this world.  It is part of our larger American paradox, in which, as Babylon 5 writer J. Michael Straczynski once observed, "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, and the future frightens us. . And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast terrible in-between....."  Whose day is Columbus Day?  Whose day is Indigenous Peoples' Day? Whose day is Encounter Day? It belongs to all of us, a day on which, perhaps more than on any other holiday or commemoration, we need to reflect on who we are, where we've been, and where we're going.

-xxx-

PAUL S. MARCHAND is a pale, European-looking, attorney.  He lives in Cathedral City, where he served two terms on the City Council, And practices law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage.  Thanks to an Act of Congress only a lawyer could love, and the fact that he lives on Indian leased land, his government considers him an Indian living on a Res.  Go figure.  The views herein are his own, not those of any jurisdiction, agency, entity, club, or other organization, and are not intended as, and should not be construed as, legal advice.

This post is a revision of an earlier post published at this time in the year 2016 and modified and republished every October 12th since then.  Since knickers are still in knots, it remains timely.


 

Saturday, May 9, 2020

THE DIRTIEST OF DIRTY TRICKS: THE SANDERNISTA PLOT TO OUST JOE BIDEN

Summary: In an interview with Megyn Kelly, Joe Biden “rape” accuser Tara Reade let slip a fairly damning truth about her tall tale of having been “sexually assaulted” by Joe Biden. In her interview, she let slip that she wanted to see the former vice president withdraw from the race for the Democratic nomination for president, a race in which Joe is already the presumptive nominee.

The only hypothesis that can be squared with the data in this case, and one which I would go before a jury confident in that jury returning a verdict favorable to my client and his case, is that Ms. Reade, a supporter of Bernard Sanders and of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, with the help and active support of the Sanders campaign and the Russian State, is trying to foment what amounts to an internal coup within the Democratic Party, so that Bernard Sanders can be foisted upon the Party against the will of the majority of Democratic primary voters, as its nominee. This bullshit, this Sanders/Putin/Trump bullshit, must not be allowed to stand. There must be a thoroughgoing purge within the Democratic Party of the Sanders holdouts and of Bernard Sanders himself.

-----------------------------

Cathedral City, May 9, 2020 — in an interview with Megyn Kelly yesterday, Joe Biden “rape” accuser Tara Reade disclosed a fairly damning truth about what has come to appear to be her vendetta against the quondam Vice President. During the interview, Reade disclosed her desire that Joe Biden should “step down” from the race.
Reade has been cheered on in her insistence that the former vice president should step down from the race by various left-wing media outlets, including, among others, the Intercept, Jacobin Magazine, and the venerable Nation, which has degenerated from being a great public Tribune of the American left to nothing more than a petulant house organ for the Bernard Sanders campaigns in 2016 and again this year.

Indeed, the obvious prejudice of The Nation against Joe Biden has, metaphorically speaking, been shouted from the housetops of 33 Irving Place in Manhattan
. On November 7 of last year, The Nation published an article entitled “Joe Biden: an Anti-Endorsement.” In so doing, The Nation ran up its crypto-Bolshevik colors and nailed them to the mast. Having declared their absolute refusal even to contemplate the possibility that Joe Biden might possibly be the candidate millions of pragmatic Democrats would support against Donald Trump, The Nation went one large, borderline racist, step further.

On February 29, 2020, in the primary that has been characterized, not least of all, by this blog as Joe Biden’s Alamein, South Carolina Democrats gave the quondam VP a victory which revived his theretofore faltering campaign. The Nation, in a state of considerable haste and dudgeon, endorsed Bernard Sanders to be the Democratic nominee just three days later, on March 2. Since then, The Nation has been all-in in support of Bernard Sanders and unstinting in its attacks against Joe Biden, and by extension, the African-American voters who put him over the top, particularly in the South.

Indeed, since the Tara Reade imbroglio surfaced, The Nation has been beating the drums as loudly as it can, trying as hard as it can, to create some kind of “Joe is a rapist” narrative in the face of ever mounting inconsistencies and credibility-destroying revelations about Tara Reade that have revealed to most people following the story that Reade’s breathless “rape” narrative is, in the words of Shakespeare’s Scottish play in Act V, scene 5, that “[she] struts and frets [her] hour upon the stage. A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, and signifying nothing,” or as Gertrude Stein once opined to her other half, Alice B. Toklas, about Oakland, “there’s no there there.”

But Tara Reade, who has made her support for Bernard Sanders and her Russophilia both vocal and controversial parts of her narrative, as she struts and frets her hour on the stage, rehashing her tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, and signifying nothing, has nonetheless given a gift to that sour, superannuated, shtetl Stalinist Schnorrer, that mendacious misogynist, that loudmouth Leninist loser, that bloviating blowhard Burlington Bolshevik Bernard Sanders and his redeless cargo-shorts Communist, Japanese-holdout-on-Pacific-island, bitter-enders who cannot accept the idea that the Democratic primary electorate might have chosen the pragmatic option against Donald Trump rather than the humorless doctrinaire whose legislative record largely consists of renaming a couple of post offices in the State of Vermont. What a cross senior Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy has to bear being yoked to Bernie Sanders!

The Sanders intransigents, no doubt bitterly disappointed when their Burlington Bolshevik bowed out and gave his endorsement to Uncle Joe, must have seen Reade’s over-the-top, fantastical, internally inconsistent, self-serving, inadmissible hearsay, narrative as a godsend. We know that both Sanders and his fanatics would like nothing better than to use Tara Reade’s tall tale as a vehicle for forcing Joe Biden out of the race.

Unfortunately for them, Joe Biden has been endorsed, as it were, by the votes of a thumping great majority of Democratic primary voters, many of them voters of color. By contrast, most of Bernard Sanders’s voters tended to be white, well-off, and fairly well connected. Unfortunately for Sanders, his primary voters were emphatically not in the majority of the Democratic primary electorate. Sanders expected that he would be swept to the nomination by a wave of “Komsomoltsy,” of 18-29-year-old voters bedazzled by his irascible “charm” and his “eat the rich” ideology. Unfortunately for them, and for Sanders himself, he is a political charlatan of the extremest order, whose charlatanries manifested themselves in sufficient time to militate against his hopes of riding the notional Komsomol wave. The 18-29 demographic, as is so often the case, stayed home in droves, preferring to play video games or wage keyboard combat rather rather than getting their butts to the polls or even filling out an absentee ballot.

So, we have a failed candidate looking for any possible vehicle to change the result of the primary elections. What we have, before us, therefore, is an old-fashioned Leninist-Stalinist effort to undo the will of the majority of Democratic voters, particularly voters of color, by setting aside the choice of that majority and foisting upon them Bernard Sanders as their nominee. This is the same sort of Russian-inspired trick that Vladimir Ilyich Lenin pulled on Julius Martov at the 1903 Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, over a dispute about who could be a member of the party. Though the evident sense of the membership was with Martov’s position, Lenin and his followers prevailed on a procedural vote, and ever thereafter referred to themselves as Bolsheviks, or Those in the Majority.

It’s certainly a touch ironic, therefore, that Sanders’s followers, who have railed at the Democratic National Committee and at Biden’s primary voters for allegedly being unfair and undemocratic to Bernie, the object of their cultic devotion, should now be interested in pulling one of the most undemocratic dirty tricks imaginable to foist their candidate — their losing, minority candidate — on the Party as its nominee in place of the overwhelming winner in delegates, the prohibitive favorite, and the presumptive nominee, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

The Trump campaign must be either creaming its jeans, popping champagne corks, or both as the so-called Sanders wing of the Democratic Party runs against Biden a dirty trick right out of Roger Stone’s playbook. Indeed, the Trump campaign has always been aware that Sanders represents a far easier candidate to beat then Biden. Sanders, who could not even convince a majority of Democrats to support him in 2016, let alone this year, would be a sacrificial lamb against Donald Trump. After all, it was Trump’s fear of Joe Biden that precipitated his attempt to strong-arm the Ukrainian government into opening a phony investigation against the former vice president and his son, Hunter. 


It should not come as a surprise, therefore, that Ms. Reade has retained the services of Douglas Wigdor, described in news coverage as “a prominent sexual harassment and assault lawyer,” with a history of supporting Donald Trump. As Mark Felt, famous as the Watergate source known as “Deep Throat,” put it, “follow the money.” Another well-connected Trump supporter representing a perfervid Sanders follower raises certain inferences which the quondam vice president and the Democratic National Committee should investigate, as it should the New York Times and Washington Post. Has there been collusion between the Trump campaign and Ms. Reade and/or the ostensibly suspended Sanders campaign? Where will the money lead? Will it come directly from Donald Trump, or will he let his callow Hofjude son-in-law, Jared “smug mug” Kushner do the dirty work and take whatever fall may have to be taken? 

It was widely known in 2016 that the intransigence, narcissism, and egomania of Bernard Sanders, his unwillingness to drop out of the campaign until the convention in Philadelphia, and his tepid-at-best assistance to Hillary Clinton, inflicted Donald Trump on this country. It is not unreasonable to ask whether then, and now, the so-called Sanders wing of the party has acted as a knowing fifth column for Donald Trump. The eager and uncritical repetition by Sanders diehards of Trump talking points both in 2016 and now, along with the eager and uncritical repetition of Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks bullshit, again by Sanders diehards, gives a great many loyal Democrats probable cause to believe that there is some kind of nefarious connection between Bernard Sanders and Donald Trump. 

The Democratic Party, the oldest still-extant political party in the world, cannot allow itself to be corrupted and betrayed from within by what amounts to a communist Militant Tendency of Bernard Sanders personality cultists. The Party must instead insist upon discipline within its own ranks. We have a presumptive nominee in Joe Biden, and the Democratic National Committee and various state and county Democratic committees need to hold every Democrat’s feet to the fire, administering loyalty tests and loyalty oaths if required to accomplish a Gleichschaltung, as it were, to bring the party into line, and to build a Parteigemeinschaft, or a unified community among members of the Democratic Party. Those who are willing to toe the party line should have nothing to fear.

But those who will not stand loyally behind the presumptive nominee of the Party, those who insist upon buying into Tara Reade’s version of events, those who seek to ram Bernard Sanders down our throats — or, perhaps worse still, to ram Bernard Sanders up the party’s collective ass — over our expressed preference for Joe Biden and over our expressed objection to the Burlington Bolshevik and his thin legislative record of renaming a couple of post offices in Vermont, those disloyal “Democrats” should be read out of the Party and into the political wilderness with bell, book, and candle. The time may be at hand for a purge of the Democratic Party under what we hope will be a Biden administration. Such a purge of the Party should be metaphorically bloody.

Democrats who will not stand with the nominee of the Party should be purged and disqualified from ever holding any position within the Party for the remainder of their natural lives. We must purge the Sanders cancer within this Party, starting with Tara Reade, and including the Sanders intransigents, and Bernard Sanders himself, the angry doctrinaire gatecrasher who can’t even be bothered to register in the party against which he so obviously desires to mount a hostile takeover.

#NeverBernie
                                                      -xxx-

Paul S. Marchand, Esq., is an attorney who lives in Cathedral City and looks forward to being able to resume his practice of law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage, once the COVID-19 pandemic unleashed upon this country by Donald Trump’s treasonable incompetence has begun to abate and businesses like his, considered nonessential, can open for business again. In the meantime, while he is quarantined, his vials of wrath are overflowing. His disdain for Bernard Sanders and Bernard Sanders’s redeless, cargo-shorts communist Militant Tendentists is whole; it is complete; it is total, and it knows absolutely no bounds.

Thursday, April 30, 2020

SOME DAMNED FOOLISH THING IN NEW YORK STATE: LAYING GROUNDWORK FOR A REPETITION OF BERNARD SANDERS’S 2016 PERFIDY.

Summary: New York’s decision to cancel the Democratic primary, while unexceptionable given the suspension of the Bernard Sanders presidential campaign, and given the fact that Joe Biden is now the presumptive Democratic nominee, may nevertheless come across as tantamount to that “damned foolish thing in the Balkans” that Imperial Germany’s Iron Chancellor Otto v. Bismarck-Schöhnausen, presciently predicted would lead to the general European war we now call World War I.

The cancellation of the New York primary, intended as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has been damned by the heretofore suspended Sanders campaign as an “outrage.” Knowing full well what perfidy that Independent Vermont Senator’s perfervidly, perpetually angry, perpetually indignant followers perpetrated against Hillary Clinton in 2016, we should expect the same kind of perfidy from the sour, superannuated, shtetl Stalinist schnorrer, the mendacious misogynist, the loudmouth Leninist loser, the bloviating blowhard Burlington Bolshevik, Bernard Sanders. It is long past time for the Democratic Party to conduct a comprehensive, thorough, purge and prophylaxis of the Sanders cancer in its midst.


----------------------------
Die Politik ist die Lehre vom Möglichen. (Politics is the art of the possible.)

-Otto, Fürst v. Bismarck, Herzog v. Lauenberg, (then Minister-President [Prime Minister] of Prussia), Interview of 11 August 1867 with Friedrich Meyer v. Waldeck of the St. Petersburgische Zeitung, also attributed to Aristotle, , John F. Kennedy, and William Jefferson Clinton.

L'hypocrisie est un hommage que le vice rend à la vertu.  (Hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue.)

-François, Duc de la Ruchefoucauld, Maxim CCXVIII c. 1670
Ils n’ont rien appris ni rien oublié. (They have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.)

-Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, sometime Bishop of Autun, Prime Minister and several time Foreign Minister of France under the Empire, the Restoration, the Hundred Days, the Second Restoration, and the July Monarchy, describing France’s Bourbon Dynasty.

Some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.

-Attributed to Bismarck, allegedly sometime between 1888 and 1890.

Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.

-Theodore Roosevelt(then Governor of New York) to Henry L. Sprague, letter, January 26, 1900

Loyalty binds me.

-Personal motto of King Richard III of England (r. 1483-1485)

--------------------------------------------------------------


Cathedral City, April 30, 2020 — New York State canceled its Democratic presidential primary the earlier this week. It did so largely because there did not appear to be any good reason for conducting a primary in a plague year in which every candidate except one had dropped out of the race and either endorsed presumptive nominee Joe Biden or given clear indications of an intent to do so.

But, that was not good enough for the perfervid partisans of the sour, superannuated, shtetl Stalinist Schnorrer, the mendacious misogynist, the loudmouthed Leninist loser, the bloviating blowhard Burlington Bolshevik Bernard Sanders.

In a statement reeking of sore-loserness, sour grapes, and Trumpian animus, Sanders campaign manager Jeffrey Weaver issued a statement, which would have been more appropriate in the German of Bismarck’s Empire, damning the state of New York, calling the cancellation of the primary a quote outrage,” and demanding that the Democratic National Committee refuse to seat the New York delegation at whatever Democratic convention may wind up being held in this plague year.

Now, since Bernard Sanders has suspended his campaign, we know the cynical reason behind his desire to remain on the ballot. Sanders has admitted that the only reason he is still in the race is to accumulate delegates so that he and his redeless, cargo-shorts communist followers can hold hostage the Democratic Party’s national platform. While politics may be the art of the possible, as Bismarck so famously opined, the Anglo-American political tradition usually requires that its more cynical excesses at least to be cloaked a serape of palatable hypocrisy.

We usually expect that vice will pay its due homage to virtue. Unfortunately, three years of Donald Trump have normalized a politics of lies, deceit, fraud, and extortion. By demanding to remain on the ballot after suspending his campaign, Bernard Sanders has essentially acknowledged what loyal Democrats around the country all knew to be the case; Bernard Sanders is nothing but a spoiler for the Republicans. His campaign effort is increasingly being revealed as a de facto fifth column for Donald Trump.

One who has chosen to end his campaign cannot be heard to complain, after his withdrawal, about the way the campaign shakes out. Other candidates, who do not choose to end their campaigns, may potentially be heard to complain, but, having unequivocally suspended his campaign and unambiguously endorsed Joe Biden, Bernard Sanders has absolutely no right to complain, either in person or through surrogates. Indeed, we may legitimately ask why, having suspended his campaign, Bernard Sanders even still has a campaign staff. Clearly, Sanders nation, like the French Bourbons, has learned nothing and forgotten nothing.

Now, granted, New York’s cancellation of its primary, notwithstanding the dangers of COVID-19, can seem, to onlookers of a particular political disposition, to lack good sense optics. Even among Biden supporters, there is a certain body of opinion which considers New York’s decision to cancel its primary, coming relatively soon after Bernard Sanders suspension of his own campaign, to be a “slap in the face,” to both Sanders and his redeless followers. To the extent that New York State’s decision may have started another confrontation between the presumptive nominee of the Party and the non-Democrat outsider who had wanted to run a hostile takeover of that Party, we may perhaps apply in retrospect, with due homage to Bismarck, the descriptor “some damned foolish thing in New York State” to the decision to cancel the New York presidential primary.

What we can predict, at all events, is that the irreconcilable, intransigent, Japanese-holdout-on-Pacific-island Sanders bitter-enders will use the cancellation of the New York presidential primary as another excuse to prosecute their political warfare campaign and agitprop against Joe Biden and against his loyalists in the desperate hope of overriding of the will of a substantial majority of the Democratic primary electorate and foisting Bernard Sanders on the Party as its minority candidate.

This they will do while loudly protesting that they and they alone represent true democracy, notwithstanding the substantial majority of voters who pulled the lever, punched the holes, marked the ballot, or otherwise registered their preference for Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

For it cannot be gainsaid that the ultimate goal of the Sanders campaign is in fact to substitute their candidate and their political judgment for the presumptive nominee and for the political judgment of a clear majority of Democratic primary voters who weighed Mr. Sanders in the balance and found him wanting.

In short, the Sanders campaign has been trying, and is trying, to mount an internal coup within the Democratic Party. While Joe Biden has learned, masterfully, the art of speaking softly and carrying a big stick, and thus of going far, the Berners, like the redeless fascist followers of Donald Trump, seem not to have appreciated the importance of moderating of their transports and not throwing temper tantrums (tantra?) when things don’t turn out their way. So, the Berners, to facilitate their coup, have been promiscuously casting about to find some kind of deus ex machina that will disqualify Joe Biden and somehow deliver the nomination to Bernard Sanders.

The Berners tried this tactic before, trotting out Lucy Flores, a so-called Berniecrat candidate for lieutenant governor of Nevada. Ms. Flores made a series of allegations that the quondam Vice President had touched her hair in a way that made her feel “uncomfortable.” When Ms. Flores’s credibility was questioned because of her perfervid support for the Independent Vermont Senator, Sanders nation had a conniption, but ultimately was powerless to derail Joe’s march toward the nomination.

Having, pace Talleyrand, learned nothing and forgotten nothing, the Berners are trying again with an even less credible claim from Tara Reade, a vocal Sanders follower and Putin groupie. Now Ms. Reade’s claims, which only surfaced within the last month, after ostensibly lying dormant for the better part of three decades, attracted immediate critical scrutiny, as did her sycophantic pro-Putin Internet blog posts. To try to keep her claims alive, she is now dredged up some sort of “interview” that her late mother supposedly gave to Larry King.

While journalists and shit stirrers, notably people like CNN’s Chris Cilizza and the Berner brigade at The Nation, the Intercept, Jacobin magazine, and similar “left-wing tea party” outlets, have crowed that this interview is “damning evidence” against Joe Biden, any second year law student studying the law of evidence can tell you that the interview purportedly given by Ms. Reade’s deceased mother is not “evidence” at all. 


First, mom’s purported evidence falls afoul of the hearsay rule, and does not fit within any of the numerous exceptions thereto.

Second, even if mom’s purported evidence could be shoehorned into some kind of exception to the hearsay rule, it is still subject to exclusion because no one can attest to the authenticity of the recording. Ms. Reade says that she is “certain” that the voice on the recording is that of her late mother, but her own credibility is subject to impeachment.

It is almost impossible to see how any trial judge, presented with this “evidence,” would ever rule in favor of its admissibility. In short, the “evidence” the Berners and the chattering classes are seeking to set up as some kind of deus ex machina to facilitate their desired Sanders coup, well, that “evidence,” in the words of a rather astute Illinois corporate lawyer named Abe Lincoln, is “as thin as the homeopathic soup that was made from the shadow of a pigeon that had starved itself to death.”

In short, the Berners, and their latest straw woman, are running out of vehicles to override the will of the Democratic Party. From the Militant Tendency among them, we may expect a repetition of the perfidy of 2016: endless attacks on the Party’s candidate, eager and uncritical repetition of the Trump talking points, eager and uncritical repetition of bullshit from WikiLeaks or other foreign disruptors, and an ongoing stream of disinformation and agitprop, aided and abetted by Trump supporters like Mark Zuckerberg.

But for Democratic loyalists, bound by their loyalty to the Democratic Party and to its nominee, the vials of wrath are full to overflowing. It is time that the Democratic National Committee strapped on its balls, put on its big boy pants, and met the Berners head on. The Berners will try to use against The Democracy our traditional reluctance to “descend to their level.” Unfortunately, the “when they go low, we go high” strategy will not work against people who believe that Tara Reade is a vehicle by which they can run their left-wing coup against the Democratic Party. Instead, when they go low, loyal Democrats must be prepared to meet them in the metaphorical basement with a switchblade.

For when pressed, members of the Sanders left will acknowledge a preferential option for Donald Trump on the double-barreled theory that things have to get absolutely horrible before they can get any better, and that four more years of Donald Trump will accelerate the coming of some kind of “political revolution.” In short, as always, the Sanders intransigents are willing to bern the country down if they cannot achieve utopia in a day.

The Democratic Party cannot afford the luxury of tolerating such a Militant Tendency. Now is the time for the party to conduct a rigorous, comprehensive purge of the Sanders cancer in its midst.

-xxx-

Paul S. Marchand, Esq. Is an attorney who lives in Cathedral City and practices law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage. He has never forgiven Bernard Sanders or his redeless, cargo shorts communist, Trump fifth column followers for their perfidy against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The opinions contained in this post are his own, unless you like them, in which case, they can be yours, too.

Thursday, April 16, 2020

LITTLE SNAPPERS: The Predicted Trash Talking of Bernie Sanders by His “Supporters,” and Why the Democrats Need to Open the Gift the Coronavirus Represents

"Heav'n has no Rage, like Love to Hatred turn'd, Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd.”

-William Congreve, The Mourning Bride (Act III Scene 2), 1697.

Screw Maximilian!
I do!
So do I!
You bastard!


- Exchange between Sally Bowles (Liza Minelli) and Brian Roberts (Michael York) in Cabaret (1972), screenplay by Jay Allen, adapted from a I Am a Camera by Christopher Isherwood.

Welcome back to the fight. This time I know our side will win.

-Victor Laszlo (Paul Henried) to Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart), Casablanca (1942), screenplay by Julius J. Epstein, Philip G. Epstein, and Howard Koch, based on a play by Murray Burnett and Joan Allison.

They pull a knife, you pull a gun, they send one of yours the hospital, you send one of theirs to the morgue!

-Jim Malone (Sean Connery) to Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner), The Untouchables (1987), screenplay by David Mamet, based on The Untouchables by Eliot Ness and Oscar Fraley.
-----------------------------------------------

Summary:  As the heavyweight endorsements of Joe Biden roll in, and as the Democratic Party coalesces around his presumptive nominee for President of the United States, there will be those, particularly on the Sanders left, who will try to condition their redirected allegiance to Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., on Biden’s proffer of a variety of policy concessions of a strongly leftist character. Biden needs to resist these demands and to keep faith with the moderate, Gladstonian liberal Democrats who have brought him to where he is today. For once you have yielded to the Berners’ demands, you can never get rid of the Bern.
    Moreover, as the campaign pivots toward the general election, Democrats at every level should weaponize against the Republicans and against their fascist Dear Leader Donald Trump their and his treasonable incompetence in mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is no time for Democrats to worry about being thought overly political, or to fear “descending to [the Republicans’] level.” They go low, screw going high; let’s meet ‘em in the basement with a switchblade. Let’s freaking wave the bloody shirt.


Cathedral City, April 16, 2020 -- The high-powered endorsements of Joe Biden’s candidacy for President of the United States continue to roll in. The other day with Bernie Sanders, yesterday it was Elizabeth Warren.

By now, Uncle Joe is more than the prohibitive favorite to win the nomination of the Democratic Party; he is the presumptive nominee, and the process of pivoting toward the general election, when our patriotism will demand of us that we unhesitatingly vote to send Uncle Joe to the White House. 


Of course, as I warned in my immediately previous post, there will be those who will be unwilling or unable to reconcile themselves to the advent of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. as either the nominee of the Democratic Party or as President of the United States.

As I suggested, some of these will be Trump agents provocateurs, infiltrated by the Trump campaign to try to cause as much damage as possible to the quondam vice president. Ultimately, these people will be fairly easily detected and fairly easily rooted out, though disturbers of the peace such as Twitter and Facebook will still eagerly traffic in anti-Biden memes and commentary for clickbait and to boost their market share. No one should ever be prepared to give Jack Dorsey or Mark Zuckerberg the benefit of any doubt whatsoever.

But, there are those fellow travelers, those perennially angry far leftists who “[have] no Rage, like Love to Hatred turn'd, Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd,” and who apparently believe that Trump represents the perfect catalyst, and that Sanders represented the perfect vehicle for the accomplishment of repetition, here in the United States, of the October Revolution of 1917. They have already begun the process of turning their vials of wrath upon both Uncle Joe and upon Bernie. Put simply, the far left is as angry as Cabaret's Sally Bowles was when she found that her boyfriend, on whom she was cheating with a Bavarian nobleman, was sleeping with the same Bavarian nobleman.  “Screw Maximilian! I do! So do I! You bastard!” Cue the drama and cue the far left freakout in 3... 2... 1....

But while Bernard Sanders may be taking heat from the #demexit dimwits, the Green Party gadflies, the Japanese-holdout-on-Pacific-islands intransigents, and the Jill Stein/Vladimir Putin groupies, and while he may be making the appropriate professions that not supporting Joe Biden is “irresponsible,” there are still indications that he is making demands on Vice President Biden and the Biden campaign that it tack further to the left than may be sensible.

Thus, while it is certainly permissible to say to the Sanders people what Victor Laszlo said to Rick Blaine in Casablanca: “Welcome back to the fight. This time I know our side will win,” and while it should not be denied, and cannot be gainsaid, that drawing as many Sanders supporters as possible into the fold of Team Biden is both advantageous and prudent, there has to be a practical limit to the concessions that any political majority makes to a strident and outspoken minority. The situation is best summed up in the pithy words of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, written a thousand years ago when England was being repeatedly blackmailed by Danish invaders and the English governments of the time, under King Æthelred II “The Unready,” kept trying to buy them off with progressively larger payments of money called Danegeld. “But once you have paid the Danegeld,” the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle warned, in one of the earliest recorded diagnoses of the pitfalls of appeasement, “you can never get rid of the Dane.” In more modern English, we might express this sad truth in the formulation “give 'em an inch, and they’ll take a mile.”

At some point, therefore, Team Biden will have to strap on its metaphorical balls and set some boundaries. If the Biden campaign allows the Sanders people to push the Democratic Party platform too far to the left, it will open up the Party to facile, if spurious, charges that the oldest still-functioning political party in the world has gone off some sort of Marxist deep end. 


Now, to a certain extent, it pains me, as a person of the historic, Gladstonian Left to acknowledge that there should be limits to our leftism. Historically, this country has always made greater advances under center-left government than under the moral bankruptcy of conservatism, which has rather lost touch with its roots in the careful, balanced, well considered thought of Edmund Burke (perhaps the greatest political thinker ever to come out of Ireland). Instead, American conservatism has tended to identify itself with William Buckley’s dictum of a conservative as “a fellow standing athwart history, yelling ‘stop!’”

By contrast, a measured, Gladstonian/Jeffersonian approach to politics stakes out a position somewhat to the left of center, in the territory we should now call classical liberalism. Unfortunately, most of the crypto-Marxist attitudes of the Sanders left are such as to give as much agita to the Gladstonian left as they are to the center and the right.

What we cannot afford--- in the 200-odd days that separate today from the November election ---  is to allow ourselves, as Democrats, to give away the unquestioned political advantage which has come our way as a result of Donald Trump’s treasonably incompetent mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite Trump’s narcissistic and pathological lies, barely one percent of the American public has been tested for coronavirus. Backlogs of tests have produced lines and inequities reminiscent of the Soviet Union and the third world. Thus, the white, the well-off, and the well-connected can get tested. The rest of us are left to surmise as to whether we have the coronavirus or whether that scratching in our throats and sniffles in our nostrils are simply artifacts of springtime pollen production. In short, on Donald Trump’s treasonably incompetent watch, the One Percent, as usual, are taken care of, while the 99%, at least in Donald Trump’s fetid mind, can go screw themselves.

The Democratic Party should understand that Trump’s gross, treasonably incompetent (and the phrase “treasonably incompetent” cannot be repeated too often) mishandling of the pandemic represents an absolutely priceless gift. Thanks to Trump’s... treasonably incompetent mishandling of the epidemic, the American economy is tanking. By this time next week, we can expect 25 million Americans to be out of work. That’s worse performance than that which drove Herbert Clark Hoover out of the White House in the elections of 1932.

But the Democratic Party needs to do a hell of a lot more than merely understand that Trump’s treasonable incompetence with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic is a gift. Gifts are no use at all unless the recipient of the gift has the good common sense to open the damn thing. And that is what fills me with fretful worry as we pivot to a general election campaign that is as fraught and full of danger as the campaign of 2020 shaping up to be.

The Democratic Party has a tendency to be caught up in a self sabotaging cult of niceness. We've always remonstrated with one another that “we mustn’t descend to their level,” and “when they go low, we go high,” noble sentiments from Michelle Obama, but in the context of the 2016 election, and in the expected context of this election, a tragically misguided formula for unconditional surrender.

Instead, we must be prepared unhesitatingly, unflinchingly, unapologetically, and un-self-critically to weaponize against the Republicans the situation in which this country finds itself. Every time a Democrat running for office at any level has an opportunity, he or she needs to excoriate his or her Republican opponent for the treasonable incompetence of the Republican Party and their gross mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. 


We should be prepared, as the Republicans were in the years following the Civil War, to “waive the bloody shirt,” holding the Republicans responsible for every single COVID-19 death in this country. 

We need to be prepared, when they go low, to meet them in the basement with a switchblade. To use Sean Connery’s line from the 1987 remake of The Untouchables, “[t]hey pull a knife, you pull a gun, they send one of yours the hospital, you send one of theirs to the morgue!”

Too many Americans have already gone to the morgue as a result of the Republican mishandling of the pandemic. Let’s make sure we send a whole raft of Republicans to the political morgue.

Wave it! Wave the fucking bloody shirt; the survival of the country depends upon it!


-XXX-

Paul S. Marchand, Esq., lives in Cathedral City, where he served as a city councilmember for two terms, and practices law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage. Like many sole practitioners, his office revenues have taken a shit as a result of the tanking of the economy in consequence of Donald Trump's treasonably incompetent mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Like many partisan Democrats, Mr. Marchand believes that the Republican Party at every level, and the Sanders left at every level, ought to be given the bum's rush. This is not a time for niceness or a time for Democrats to fret about "descending to the Republicans' level. The views contained herein are Mr. Marchand's own, unless you like them, in which case, they can be yours, too.

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

BERNIE SANDERS’S JOURNEY TO THE MISSOURI

Summary: It has finally happened. Bernard Sanders endorsed Joe Biden’s campaign for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States yesterday. It did not take Bernie as long as many had expected it to take to get with the program, so to speak. Metaphorically speaking this was like the journey Japanese Foreign Minister Shigemitsu Mamoru and chief of the Imperial General Staff Umezu Yoshijiro had to make to the battleship Missouri on September 2, 1945, the day the Japanese Empire surrendered to the Allied powers. The task will now be to integrate as many supporters of Bernard Sanders as possible into a unified campaign to defeat Donald Trump in November. Equally important, however, will be deterring the intransigent holdouts whose animus toward Joe Biden will lead them to do everything possible to sabotage his campaign.
-----------------------------------------

Cathedral City, April 13, 2020 –- Bernard Sanders made it official yesterday. That morning, the Independent Vermont Senator endorsed Joe Biden’s candidacy for President of the United States. Sanders’s endorsement comes far earlier in the campaign than did his endorsement of Hillary Clinton in 2016. In that year, Sanders continued the fight all the way to the Democratic convention in Philadelphia, where a large number of his diehard, intransigent supporters staged a theatrical walkout and demonstration outside the convention center.

Hopefully, Sanders’s endorsement, coming just after Easter, will enable the Democrats to field a far more unified, far more disciplined campaign against Donald Trump then was the case four years ago.

It is probably safe to say that for a great many supporters of Bernard Sanders, the last few days have recapitulated the five Elisabeth Kübler-Ross stages of grieving: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. Polling data suggest that fully eighty percent of Sanders supporters have seen, or will be able to see, their way clear to supporting Joe Biden as the campaign now pivots to the general election.

In so doing, these former Sanders supporters will have recapitulated the experience of many activists involved in an unsuccessful primary campaign. Former Texas agriculture Commissioner and Sanders supporter Jim Hightower described the experience as being something like taking the "Midnight Train."

Late on election night, as the returns come in, and becomes mathematically impossible for your candidate to win the primary, you take that metaphorical "Midnight Train" over to the headquarters of the victor. Once there, you grit your teeth, mend fences, have a couple of helpings of humble pie, and then put your name on the volunteer list for the victorious candidate's general election campaign.

Jim Hightower’s Midnight Train metaphor resonates with most of us because most of us have supported at least one unsuccessful candidate’s primary campaign. However, I expect that the metaphor that hits most powerfully home for a lot of disappointed Sanders supporters right now will be the “journey to the Missouri” metaphor that finds its source in the surrender of Japan to the Allied powers, which took place aboard the battleship Missouri (BB-63) on September 2, 1945.

The surrender proceedings, carried out under the auspices and at the direction of Gen. Douglas MacArthur, went off with a kind of grace and dignity by which the irresistible power of the United States and her allies was showcased while at the same time saving the face (Ch. bao mianzi) of the Japanese participants in them.

As I suggested in this blog a couple weeks ago, the critical issue for the Biden campaign would be enlarging the traditional big Democratic tent and inserting leaves into the table to accommodate those Sanders supporters who were willing to take the Midnight Train and enter the Biden fold.

Unfortunately, not every Sanders supporter will be willing to make that midnight journey. There will be those self identified followers of Bernard Sanders who will eagerly live down to the stereotype of the intransigent, bitter-ender, Japanese-holdout-on-Pacific-island, and defiant resisters for whom the mantra “#never Biden” is one by which they will live and die.

These intransigents fall into three broad categories.

The first of these are the Trump/Kremlin trolls and moles.
These are the people who infiltrate the Democratic Party in order to cause enmity and division within it. Their motivations are not motivations of support for Bernard Sanders as much as they are expressions of hatred toward Joe Biden, injected into the Democratic primary structure for the ultimate and ulterior purpose of aiding and abetting Donald Trump’s reelection effort.

The second group of self-identified Sanders intransigents have no real dog in the political hunt; they are simply anarchists and bomb throwers who delight in raising little hell and making people crazy.

The third, and most dangerous, category of bitter-end intransigents are those who do in fact have an ideological dog in the hunt. These, frequently identifiable by a large number of social media “likes” of Marxist or socialist memes, themes, and groups, tend to see the presidency of Donald Trump as a catalyst for a repetition, in the United States, of the October Revolution of 1917. In their Weltanschauung, Bernard Sanders is nothing but the instrumentality by which this October Revolution is to be accomplished.
 

This third group of intransigents seeks, in Leninist fashion, to “heighten the contradictions” in American society with a view toward fomenting that October Revolution. Sanders, whom they had relied upon to be their vehicle for the accomplishment of their sought-after October Revolution will be derided as a “sellout” before this day is over. 

We may expect, within the next twelve to twenty-four hours, to hear all, or at least a substantial number of, the cargo shorts communists who had loudly professed their fealty to Bernard Sanders to trot out every thought-terminating cliché available to them to express their anger at his endorsement of Joe Biden. “Centrist,” “sellout,” “corporatist,” “corporate whore,” and probably a few anti-Semitic broadsides will form the underpinning of the intransigent polemic against Bernie Sanders.

Feeling betrayed by Senator Sanders, the intransigents will include both him and Joe Biden in their polemic. Many of them will probably gravitate toward a third-party candidate, such as Putin’s pal Jill Stein, the perennial presidential hopeful of the Green Party. In the end, however, many of them will pledge their "fealty" to Donald Trump in the hopes that a second Trump term will sufficiently heighten the contradictions to the point where an "October Revolution" becomes inevitable.

Tuesday, April 7, 2020

LITTLE SNAPPERS: THE UNBELIEVABLY CHURLISH AND TREASONABLY INCOMPETENT BEHAVIOR OF THE ACTING SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AND THE BREATHTAKING FOOLISHNESS OF CORONAVIRUS DENIERS.

 LITTLE SNAPPERS: THE UNBELIEVABLY CHURLISH AND TREASONABLY INCOMPETENT BEHAVIOR OF THE ACTING SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AND THE BREATHTAKING FOOLISHNESS OF CORONAVIRUS DENIERS.

 By:  Paul S. Marchand

When you are in a hole, stop digging.

                -Old management proverb, much quoted in the Armed Forces, the U.S. Navy among them.

There’s a turd on the deck. Don’t kick it.

                -Another old management proverb, also much quoted in the Armed Forces, the U.S. Navy among them.

FUBAR (Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition)

                -Apocryphal Armed Forces acronym.

Tell the truth, and fuck the consequences.

                -Advice often given by mentors to young officers of the Navy and the Marine Corps.

The Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact.


                -From Terminiello v. Chicago, (1949)337 U.S. 1, Jackson, J., dissenting at 36

The right of free exercise of religion does not trump the rights of others.


                -Attr, in various forms, to Rev. Canon Susan Russell of All Saints Episcopal Church, Pasadena, California.

Dum Spiro Spero (while I breathe, I hope.)

            -State Motto of South Carolina

Are you bloody mad?

                -Variously attributed, most recently from incoming Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer KCB QC to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson


Summary: The firing of Captain Brett Crozier, formerly CO of the aircraft carrier
Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71), has managed to metastasize into a political cause célèbre underlining the churlishness and treasonable incompetence of the Trump administration, the Trump organized crime family, the outgoing acting Secretary of the Navy, and Donald Trump himself.


Responses to the Covid-19/coronavirus outbreak have begun themselves to break down on partisan lines. Democrats, sensible people, and members of mainline churches are tending to comply with shelter-in-place orders and social distancing guidelines. The Trump Protestant Nonconformist evangelical base, on the other hand, is trying to cloak its defiance of safety measures in a gaudy sarape of “religious freedom” hypocrisy. Apparently their freedom to waive Bibles in everyone else’s face trumps the freedom of the rest of the community to be safe and healthy.

---------------------------------------------------
Cathedral City, April 7, 2020 –- during my brief flirtation with the United States Navy in the late summer of 1981 – that is, before I was deterred from a naval career because I knew that I was an unrepentant incipient queer boy– people I knew who had served in the Navy tended to adhere to a number of fairly simple principles.


One of these was the idea that when you are in a hole, stop digging. This principle seems to have been lost on Donald Trump, on Defense Secretary Mark Esper, and most certainly on just-resigned acting Navy secretary Thomas Modly.

In a 15 minute rant to the crew of the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) in Guam yesterday, the outgoing acting Secretary flayed Capt. Brett Crozier, the carrier’s quondam CO, who has since tested positive for coronavirus, as “naïve” and “stupid,” for having had the effrontery to tell the truth about a rapidly metastasizing COVID-19/coronavirus outbreak aboard the vessel, one of America’s 11 frontline aircraft carriers. There was a turd on the deck, and SECNAV kicked it, vigorously, several times.

In his unbelievably ill-considered, FUBAR remarks, Modly accused Captain Crozier of having “betrayed” the Navy. That is the kind of allegation that normally leads to an Article 32 hearing and a possible General Court Martial for the servicemember so accused. It is tantamount to accusing someone of one of the gravest crimes of which the Uniform Code of Military Justice takes cognizance.

In civil tort law, to make such an allegation, if the allegation is false or if it is made without probable cause to believe that it is true, constitutes the tort of slander per se.

Modly should perhaps consider himself lucky that he was able to disembark with his person — albeit not his career as acting SECNAV — intact after the way in which he disrespected the entire ship’s company of the Theodore Roosevelt. Of course, Modly’s shipboard temper tantrum is emblematic of the way in which the most corrupt, inept, treasonably incompetent administration in American history responds to anyone who does not trumpet or parrot the official party line of the Maximum Leader Donald Trump.

Throughout the entire COVID-19/coronavirus crisis, this administration’s handling of the epidemic has been characterized by a combination of callow stupidity, such as that displayed on a regular and ongoing basis by Trump’s son-in-law, the ridiculous Hofjude Jared Kushner, and treasonable incompetence, such as is displayed by Donald Trump himself every time he speaks in one of his marathon, mendacious, turgid, straight-outta-Pyongyang, I wanna-set-my-hair-on-fire, campaign rally coronavirus “briefings.” 


Most of what we have heard from the Trump administration on the subject of COVID-19/coronavirus has been the kind of willful lies and untruths in which Donald Trump has trafficked since he was first spawned, a freakish homunculus germinated outside lawful procreation. In short, everything that has come from the mouth of The Donald on the subject of COVID-19/coronavirus has been at best a distortion of the truth, and usually an arrant falsehood.

Now, historically, the Navy, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Marine Corps, have traditionally had a culture of truth-telling, and fuck the consequences. In an actual war, it may be necessary to give the truth a convoy of lies, but, Trump and his “wartime president” bullshit notwithstanding, a medical emergency is not a war.

A medical emergency demands the same culture of truth-telling, of speaking truth to power, that the Navy and the Corps have always sought to internalize. To borrow a conceit from former Secretary of State John Kerry, when leaders lie, servicemembers die. When civilian leaders lie, particularly in the context of a contagion, citizens die. This was the reality Captain Brett Crozier was confronting aboard his vessel.

Though Theodore Roosevelt is one of the largest vessels in the United States Navy, it is, like all naval vessels, a relatively cramped place in which to accommodate nearly 5700 souls. When 5700 servicemembers are crammed together in close proximity in a hull 1092 feet long and 134 feet wide, it is altogether tempting fate to expect a viral contagion not to spread rapidly among the crew. Crozier’s impulse, to land as much of his crew as possible so they could be quarantined and the ship could be disinfected and returned speedily to service, appears to have been very much the correct one.

By contrast, the Trump administration’s response to his actions to protect his crew and his command, and to make his ship ready again for combat, has been rightly characterized by several members of the House Armed Services Committee as “a reckless, political move that reeks of undue command influence.”

Certainly, the Trump administration has sent and reinforced a message to every senior commander in the armed services that they had better be prepared to toe the administration’s line, even at the risk of the lives of the servicemembers under their command, or else.

This is very much akin to the message Iosif Stalin sent to his Armed Forces in the late 1930s when substantial numbers of the senior officer ranks of the Red Army were purged, either being shot or disappearing into the gulags until, in 1941 and 1942, with the Wehrmacht at the very gates of Moscow, Stalin discovered that he had contrived to purge the brains of his military and brought back many of the still-living purged officers. Stalin’s purge of the Soviet Armed Forces also sent a message to Herr Hitler and his generals that the Soviet Union was ripe for invasion, and would collapse if attacked.

Of course, the Soviet Union did not collapse after the Germans invaded it on June 22, 1941. But, the Soviets took a hell of a beating during the Great Patriotic War. Something in excess of 20 million Soviet citizens died during that war. And in large measure they died because of Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin’s treasonable incompetence in purging the Soviet Armed Forces in the late 1930s.

Now, as pleasing as it may be to Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin to contemplate the prospect of a wholesale, Stalin-esque purge of the United States Armed Forces, and while it might be gratifying to The Donald to contemplate such a thing, we Americans do not take the kind of shit from our elected leaders that Russians have been taking from their Tsars and dictators from Ivan the Terrible through Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, and Nicholas I, right down through Vladimir Ilyich Lenin and Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin himself.

Thomas Modly, who gloried — until his resignation today — in the title of “acting” Secretary of the Navy, may very well have set a spark to tinder by insulting in Captain Crozier’s person the entire crew of Theodore Roosevelt. That discontent may very well spread through the Navy, the Corps, and the other components of this country’s armed forces.  


By treasonably incompetently interfering with good order and discipline in the service of which he is ostensibly the civilian had, Thomas Modly will have only himself to blame if the entire political order in the United States is upended by a single bullet with Donald Trump’s name on it, fired at him by a disgruntled Navy sniper. It would be even better, and karmically appropriate, were the sniper in question a registered Republican who had voted for Donald Trump in 2016.

    * * * * *
    Of course, if the Trump administration’s treasonable incompetence in handling the coronavirus outbreak has resulted in aiding the Russian State by undermining good order, morale, and discipline in our Armed Forces, it has also had the effect of emboldening that pernicious, malignant tendency among Protestant Nonconformist evangelicals toward the denial of anything resembling science and evidence-based evaluation of facts.


Around the country, reports are surfacing of large Protestant, Nonconformist evangelical conventicles whose pastors are encouraging and conjuring their easily deceived parishioners into defying public health authorities’ orders concerning sheltering-in-place and social distancing.

Rather than act with loving care and concern for the well-being of those who have entrusted themselves to their spiritual ministrations, these so-called pastors have been encouraging their flocks to attend services in packed mega-churches as a gesture of defiance to those public health authorities, and presumably to the “deep state.”

Now, from a purely Darwinian standpoint, it might make sense to call the herd and conduct a prophylaxis of the gene pool; from a purely Malthusian standpoint, there is something to be said for eliminating useless mouths wired to non-functioning brains and connected to uptight, hemorrhoidal, assholes.

However, correctly believing Christians do not organize their thinking along such grim, reductionist lines. We believe in a radically inclusive Gospel which commands us to love our neighbors, to care for our neighbors, and insofar as we are able, to keep our neighbors’ dumb asses out of harm’s way. In the context of COVID-19/coronavirus, that means not importuning your flock to come to your church, flouting all social distancing recommendations, just so they can stroke your ego and fatten your collection plates.

Indeed, if these pernicious pastors want to elevate to the level of a constitutional imperative their rights to infect their flocks with a potentially deadly virus, the law can and will respond appropriately to their illegal, antisocial, criminal, to say nothing of unchristian, activities.

For despite what these preachers of perdition may believe, no constitutional right or freedom is absolute. It is well-settled, for example, that, in a free speech context, the government may regulate the time, manner, and place in which speech happens, as long as the regulations are content-neutral, and narrowly tailored to advance a compelling government interest. That analytical framework may appropriately be applied to the exercise of any constitutionally guaranteed right.

Thus, even the right of the free exercise of religion may be subject to reasonable regulation if it is content and viewpoint-neutral, and narrowly tailored to advance a compelling government interest. In this case, all the empirical data at our command suggest unanswerably that large worship gatherings have the unfortunate side effect of being strong vectors for COVID-19/coronavirus transmission. 


Social distancing regulations and restrictions on gatherings, to the extent they are truly content and viewpoint-neutral, and tailored to advance a compelling government interest in maintaining the health of a given community, should therefore be considered constitutionally permissible, notwithstanding the generalized First Amendment guarantee that “Congress shall make no law respecting an Establishment of Religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

As long as such regulations are temporary, and sunset at the earliest possible time, the regulations may be defended on that basis. After all, the Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact. See. e.g., Terminiello v. Chicago (1949) 337 U.S. 1 at 36 (Jackson, J., dissenting).  The free exercise right, in such a context, should not trump the civil rights of others, including the most important right of all, the right to life. After all, as the state motto of South Carolina assures us, Dum Spiro Spero, "while I breathe, I hope."

While pernicious preachers may preach promises of perdition to their flocks, and while those flocks themselves are perfectly free, in our constitutional theory, to believe that Donald Trump is some kind of Fourth Person of the Trinity, Who will miraculously save them from the ‘Rona, the rest of us have a right to say to them “are you bloody mad?” and resist their invasion of our rights under color of asserting their own.
-xxx-

Paul S. Marchand, Esq. is an attorney who lives in Cathedral City and practices law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage. His allegedly nonessential office is running on a very limited basis in consequence of the contagion, and he himself has had only incidental contact with another human being in days. If the birds in his courtyard start talking to him, he will know that he has been socially isolating for too long, and that the ‘Rona is having a bad effect on his mind. This post was originally written yesterday, prior to Acting SECNAV Modly’s resignation. Overtaken by events, it has been revised to reflect the changed situation.

Friday, March 27, 2020

THE SANDERS DOLSCHSTOßLEGENDE

Yes, that's it, exactly, we were stabbed in the back.

        -German General Erich Ludendorff, fall, 1919, Adlon Hotel interview with General Sir Neill Malcolm, head of the British Military Mission in Berlin.

Remember.

        -Last words of King Charles I to Bishop William Juxon just before his execution outside the Banqueting House in Whitehall, January 30, 1649

Following are our terms. We will not deviate from them. There are no alternatives. We shall brook no delay.

        -Section 5 of the Potsdam Declaration,(Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender), Potsdam, Preußen, July 26, 1945.

No terms except an unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted.

        -Brig. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, U.S.A. to Brig. Gen. Simon Bolivar Buckner, Sr., C.S.A., before Fort Donelson, Tennessee, February 16, 1862
----------------------------------------------------------

Summary: As we find ourselves hunkering down in the face of the Covid-19/coronavirus pestilence, and as many of us find ourselves dusting off, or purchasing anew, copies of Daniel Defoe’s Journal of the Plague Year, we also find ourselves witnessing the protracted death throes of Independent Vermont Senator Bernard Sanders’s doomed primary campaign for the presidency of the United States. We also find ourselves watching Sanders intransigents trying very hard to fabricate a congenial “we wuz robbed,” stab-in-the-back narrative, a Dolschstoßlegende to try to explain away Bernie’s unexpectedly lackluster performance. There are still those alive in their great age who can remember how the German right eagerly trafficked in such “we wuz robbed,”  stab-in-the-back, Dolschstoßlegende fantasies in their ultimately successful attempt to discredit and destroy Germany’s Weimar Republic. It cannot be allowed to happen another time.


Cathedral City March 26, 2020 –- as we shelter in place, curling up with old, dusty, or recently purchased copies of Daniel Defoe’s Journal of the Plague Year, a book whose reading ought to frighten the shit out of every one of us, our enforced staycations have given us the unwonted leisure of witnessing the protracted  death throes of Independent Vermont Sen. Bernard Sanders’s primary campaign for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.

A week ago, I suggested in this blog that the Sanders campaign might possibly be in what amounted to surrender negotiations with the Biden campaign to work out terms for some kind of graceful Sanders withdrawal in a fashion that would enable the party to unify quickly and find the cohesion necessary to defeat the treasonably incompetent, but well financed and organized, Russian asset Donald Trump.

I appear to have been somewhat in error. Apparently, Sanders and his claque of redeless, millennial, cargo shorts communists have resolved to fight it out to the bitter end, notwithstanding the damage they may do to the Democratic Party and to the country in the process. Already, however, Gospodin Sanders and his campaign have begun fabricating a repetition of their 2016 “we wuz robbed,” stab-in-the-back, Dolschstoßlegende to try to explain away Gospodin Sanders’s unexpectedly lackluster performance in the 2020 Democratic primaries.

These attempts by Sanders intransigents to fabricate again their “we wuz robbed,” stab-in-the-back, Dolschstoßlegende of 2016 bear a disturbing resemblance to those of the German right wing to fabricate a similar narrative against the Weimar Republic after the end of the Great War.

Indeed, the structural reasons for Sanders’s well-nigh inevitable loss are similar to those underlying the defeat of the German Reich in the Great War, and are just as ineluctable. Imperial Germany believed that its superior resources, military prowess, and kultur, coupled with the famous discipline that resulted in one wag describing the Germans as a people who, if they wanted to start revolution by seizing the train stations, would all line up to purchase tickets, would see it successfully through a European war. Similarly, Sanders and his campaign staff believed with a kind of touching, almost childlike faith that the small, hard core of Sanders’s followers would be enough to take him first past the post in a badly fragmented Democratic primary.


 What Sanders and his remarkably redeless followers did not realize was that their zeal, their toxicity, and their combative approach to the Democratic primary electorate would alienate that electorate and engender a Democratic coalescence around the person of a more viable candidate, Joe Biden.

The sheer combative pugnaciousness of Sanders’s followers, their misogyny, their condescending attitude toward loyal Democrats, their eager and uncritical repetition against Biden of Trump/Kremlin talking points, and they are more or less constant freakouts at even the slightest criticism of the sour, superannuated shtetl Stalinist schnorrer, all of these raised up a tsunami of anger and disdain, rather akin to the reaction of what French Prime Minister René Viviani pointedly called the civilized world against the German torching of the world-famous library of Louvain/Leuven on August 25, 1914.

This incendiary act was sought to be justified by the government of the Reich as a necessary act of Schrecklichkeit, a kind of Clausewitzian terror intended to frighten the Belgian people into submission. Instead, the burning of the library at Louvain and the other terroristic acts that accompanied the German Rape of Belgium steeled the resolve of the Belgians and imposed upon the Reich a moral odium it was never able to shake off.

The moral odium of the burning of the library at Louvain, the execution of Edith Cavell the following year, and the mass executions that took place, particularly of young men of military age, aroused in Europe, and later in the United States, a fighting spirit against Germany that was not extinguished until the armistice of 1918.

Unfortunately, the defeat of Imperial Germany did not produce the desired Wilsonian outcome of a comprehensive European peace. Within days of the conclusion of the armistice, and its signature by Matthias Erzberger, the German right was already excoriating the government of the new Weimar Republic as the Novemberverbrecher (November criminals) and busily promulgating what became known as the Dolschstoßlegende, a stab-in-the-back narrative designed to exonerate the German Armed Forces in particular and the German right in general from responsibility for Germany’s defeat.

Indeed, the German Dolschstoßlegende may be said to have gotten its “official” start in a fall, 1919 interview between Gen. Sir Neill Malcolm, of the British Military Mission in Berlin, and former German general staff chief Gen. Erich Ludendorff, who, responding to a question from Gen. Malcolm concerning the responsibility for Germany’s defeat, exclaimed “[Y]es, that's it, exactly, we were stabbed in the back.”

A century later, with the Sanders campaign losing steam and the Biden campaign apparently going from strength to strength as the forces of moderation gain ascendancy in the Democratic Party, the prefervid votaries of Vermont Senator find themselves falling back upon Gen. Ludendorff’s view of events. They are unwilling to accept two well supported hypotheses for Vice President Biden’s unexpectedly strong performance in the Democratic primaries from and after South Carolina.

The first of these hypotheses is that Democratic primary voters have been more favorably impressed with the quondam Vice President than they have with a pugnacious, self-righteous, un-self-aware, contentious, self-described democratic socialist from one of the whitest states in the Union. Joe, who has the distinct historic advantage of having been vice president to America’s first African-American president, and who also has the advantage of not demanding from his supporters absolute ideological purity on every issue, has an ability to connect with electorates of color that Bernard Sanders does not. Joe also has an ability to empathize with people that Sanders, who sees people largely as ideological abstractions, also appears to lack. 


The second hypothesis stems from, and is supported by, the ineluctable fact that both Sanders and his followers tend to be offputting. As has been noted extensively, by abler analysts that I, Sanders’s failure to grow his base, to rely upon a small, hard core of ideologically committed, pugnacious, followers, many of whom have severe anger and misogyny issues, also put off millions of more moderate Democrats who are not only tired of the treasonable incompetence of the Trump administration, but are also tired of the relentless angry, Marxist posturing from the Sanders campaign. 

Add to that the ill concealed misogyny of the Vermont Senator and his followers, exemplified in his dismissal of Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, when Gospodin Sanders airily discounted Sen. Warren’s candidacy by stating that a woman could not be elected president, and further exemplified by his and his followers’ eager, unceasing, and uncritical repetition against Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, and Warren herself of the Trump campaign’s talking points in 2016 against Hillary Clinton, and it is not difficult to see why women and moderate men would be flocking to the notoriously tactile Joe Biden, even if Joe does have a propensity for gaffes that send the #metoo people into orbit. 

Finally, the other bit of evidence that supports the second, “Sanders and his base are unbelievably offputting” hypothesis lies in the equally eager, unceasing, and uncritical repetition by the Sanders campaign and the Senator’s followers of a widely debunked “Joe has dementia” narrative taken straight from the talking points and agitprop of Donald Trump and the Moscow Kremlin.

It is common knowledge that Vice President Biden suffered from an appalling childhood stutter. As a southpaw, growing up in a world of northpaws, I, too, suffered from a childhood stutter, albeit far milder and less intrusive than that which afflicted the former Vice President. I overcame it when the hormones of my queer puberty kicked in, but when I broke my left wrist several years ago, and had to take up writing with my right hand, it manifested itself again. My revenge, like that of many other members of the Irish diaspora, was to take the tongue of the conqueror and make it so completely my own that I gained a reputation for having what the Irish would call “the gift of the gab,” and, since revenge is a dish best savored ice cold, I cemented that revenge by taking a 780 verbal on my SATs. 


I thus reject the Sanders/Trump talking point that the sequelae of Vice President Biden’s stutter, which can sometimes creep up on all of us sometime stutterers and induce the occasional verbal gaffe or misstep, are a sign of incipient dementia. I also find that the Sanders campaign’s repetition of such a talking point reflects a serious lack of moral compass. Indeed, I consider it tantamount to Donald Trump’s mockery of New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski at a 2015 rally, when Trump poked fun at the reporter’s arthrogryposis, a debilitating disability of the joints.

To make fun of someone’s disability, and to imply that that disability connotes mental limitations or the onset of dementia is simply immoral. Trump was wrong to of done it to Serge Kovaleski, and the Sanders campaign and his supporters are equally wrong to have done it, and continue to do it, to Joe Biden.

Thus, the data supporting the “Sanders and his campaign are unbelievably offputting” hypothesis are clear, convincing, and beyond reasonable doubt. Add to that the Sanders campaign’s solipsistic, un-self-aware unwillingness to acknowledge incipient defeat, and their insistence upon nurturing aggrieved memories, as if King Charles the Martyr had whispered “remember” into their collective ear as he was being led to execution, imposes upon them a moral odium from which, like Imperial Germany after the burning of the library in Louvain, they may never escape. 


The time is at hand for the much-maligned Democratic National Committee to issue to Sanders an ultimatum, couched in the same uncompromising terms as the Potsdam Declaration addressed to Japan in July, 1945 “Following are our terms. We will not deviate from them. There are no alternatives. We shall brook no delay.”

Joe Biden, love him, like him, or loathe him, is the prohibitive favorite of the Democratic Party to be its nominee for president of the United States. The Sanders people need to get their asses in line, get with the program, and loyally support the Party’s nominee. They need to stop presuming upon the good nature of the Biden Democrats, and to understand that a point is at hand at which, as Gen. Grant wrote to Gen. Buckner on that chilly February morning in 1862 before Fort Donelson, “[N]o terms except an unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted.” We can brook no delay.


-xxx-

Paul S. Marchand is a lawyer who lives in Cathedral City and practices law in the adjacent Republican retirement redoubt of Rancho Mirage. He is a recovering politician, having served two terms on the Cathedral City city Council, and more years than he cares to think about on the Riverside County Democratic Central Committee. He was all in for Hillary in 2016, and is all in for Joe this time around. The views contained herein are his own, unless you find them congenial, in which case, they can be yours, too.